Just as night follows day and day follows
night, a Peyton Manning post-season loss is swiftly followed by an ‘Is Peyton
Manning clutch?’ debate. Look
around you; there is almost certainly one taking place at this very second.
Brian from accounting is probably deeming one of the most successful athletes
of all time as a ‘choker’ and Skip Bayless is definitely discussing the size
and relative strength of Manning’s ‘clutch gene’, which seems like a
conversation that should only take place at the doctor’s surgery.
These conversations are almost always
rooted in laziness and come from a desire to perpetuate a certain narrative as
opposed to calmly assessing the facts. I understand it’s not always possible to
factor in every single post season game when jumping to wildly inaccurate
conclusions, but that also does not mean we have to stand idly by and watch
analyst after analyst blindly trot out the ‘Peyton Manning is a choker’ without
first looking at the relevant the evidence.
Let’s get a few things out of the way
before we start. Firstly, I am very aware of Manning’s post season record and I
am not here to defend it, he has lost 13 post season games and made a number of
mistakes during some (this word is
crucial) of those games. His post-season record absolutely does not hold up
when compared to his regular season record and those 13 losses are the most for
any NFL starting quarterback.
These are all negative statements about
Peyton Manning and his ability to win important football games. What they are not,
is proof that Manning lacks ability in the ‘clutch’ or justification to make
declarative statements such as ‘Peyton Manning collapses under the pressure of
the post season.’ And herein lies the problem. In an attempt to fill column
inches and pad out podcast minutes people invariably slip into the habit of
discussing sport in purely black and white terms.
What if Peyton Manning is in fact a really,
really good quarterback who, through a combination of occasional poor play,
mistakes from his teammates and a high level of play from the opposing team,
lost some important games? What if we didn’t just see things through a strict
binary of good/bad and winner/loser? Would that be so bad? Would this approach
to analysis lessen the amount of scorching hot takes? Yes, I think it would. So
let’s give it a go shall we?
Using Advanced Football Analytics’ WPA (Win
Probability Added), explained here, good old fashioned passer rating and less
old fashioned QBR (QBR ratings only go back to 2006) let’s take a look at Manning’s
13 losses in the post season with a specific focus on his performance in the
fourth quarter. I’ve also added the Vegas line to frame the conversation in
terms of the public’s expectation of Manning as I think it is crucial when it
comes to they way we analyze his performances.
One last thing, I considered also using Advanced
Football Analytics’ EPA (Expected Points Added) but I decided to focus just on
WPA as it ‘simply measures the impact of each play toward winning and losing’
and ‘it can help tell us who is, or at least appears to be, “clutch”', as
I thought it was more relevant to the discussion.
AFC
Divisional Round Sunday January 16th, 2000
Spread: Colts -5.5
Result: Titan 19 Colts 16
The Colts secured a bye in the regular
season finishing with a record of 13-3. In the divisional round they took on a
Tennessee Titans team fresh off the ‘music city miracle’ game. This game was
the birthplace of the ‘Manning doesn’t perform in the post season’ narrative
although we didn’t know it at the time. Manning didn’t have a bad game and he
certainly didn’t lose the game for the Colts, finishing 19-42 for 227 yards and
a rare rushing touchdown, but he finished with a pedestrian passer rating of
62.3 significantly lower that his regular season rating of 90.7.
Manning went 4-16 for 42 yards in the
fourth quarter with one rushing touchdown. These are hardy stellar numbers but
using Pro-Football Reference’s model, Indianapolis’s win percentage was at
14.7% the first time Manning attempted a pass in the fourth and Indy were
already down by seven at that stage. He accounted for the Colts’ sole score in
the final quarter and was obviously not involved in his team’s failure to
recover the onside kick.
In terms of WPA Manning finished the game
with a score of 0.09, which was lower than his regular season average of 0.27. To
that end, there could be some validity in assigning Manning a degree of blame
for the Colts loss.
Summary: Although not a great game for Peyton, his slightly subpar
performance was not the reason the Colts lost this game.
AFC Wild Card Round, Saturday December 30th, 2000
Spread: Colts -1.5
Result: Dolphins 23, Colts 17 (OT)
The Colts came into this game as slight
favorites despite the fact they were the 6th seed. The game was
sealed in overtime as Lamar Smith went over for a touchdown after Colts kicker
Mike Vanderjagt had missed a 49-yard field goal. Manning went 17-32 for 194
yards with a touchdown and no interceptions. He finished with a rating of 82.0
which was just below his season average of 94.7.
As the game went to overtime it’s probably
more pertinent to look at Manning’s performance there as opposed to the fourth
quarter, however, I will point out that in that fourth quarter Manning led a
drive from the Colts 23 yard line that ended with a field goal and a seven
point lead for the Colts with 5:01 remaining on the clock. At that stage the
Dolphins had a 3.5% chance of winning the game.
In overtime Manning went 3-4 for 47 yards.
Looking at the box score now, perhaps the biggest mistake the Colts made was
not going for it on 4th and 1 at Miami’s 31, but as their kicker had
made a similar kick in the fourth, it’s hard to fault them too much.
Manning’s WPA was 0.20 after a regular
season average of 0.18 so in terms of expectations, Manning did just as much as
we would have expected for the Colts to win the game.
Summary:
This is a tough one to analyze. On one side, you
could definitely make the case to absolve Manning of most of the responsibility
for this loss. He had a solid game and he certainly wasn’t the sole reason for
the Colts loss. It comes down to how much stock you put into intangibles like
‘desire’, ‘heart’ and dare I say it, ‘clutchness’. There are some who believe
that because Manning didn’t drive his team the length of the field in overtime
and score a game-winning touchdown, he lost the game for the Colts. These are
usually the same people who firmly believe Tim Tebow would have won this game,
just because you know, he really, really, really wanted to win. Miami
manufacturing a drive when they needed it and the Colts kicker missing a field
goal are probably more relevant factors here when attributing blame or praise than Manning’s ability, or lack
thereof, to win a playoff game.
AFC Wild Card Round, Saturday January 4th, 2003
Spread: Jets -6
Result: Jets 41, Colts 0
Avert gaze if you’re a Manning fan, this
one’s not pretty. If the 2000 loss against the Dolphins was tough to analyze,
this one is the polar opposite. The entire Colts team were awful and although a
porous offensive line and six drops certainly didn’t help, Manning had a poor
day by any standard. His passer rating was 31.2 down from another solid regular
season figure of 88.8. He went 14-31 for 137 yards with zero touchdowns and two
interceptions and an atrocious 4.42 yards per attempt.
There’s obviously not much analysis needed
for the fourth quarter here. For continuity’s sake I will tell you that when
the Colts began the quarter, the Jets had a 100% win percentage. This game was
lost/won, depending on your perspective, long before the fourth. Manning’s WPA
after this game was -0.04 after a regular season figure of 0.07.
Summary:
Manning was terrible in this game and all the
relevant stats show this. The game started awfully for the Colts and got
progressively worse. This game hurt’s Manning’s post-season reputation but he
doesn’t shoulder the blame alone.
AFC Championship Game, Saturday January 18th, 2004
Spread: Patriots -3.5
Result: Patriots 24, Colts 14
After finally securing his first post
season win and following it up with another victory against the Chiefs in
Kansas City, Manning went into Foxboro hoping to make his first Super Bowl.
This was Manning’s biggest playoff game of his career and, well, he was pretty
terrible. He went 23-47 for 237 yards with one touchdown and four interceptions.
His passer rating was 35.5 after post-season highs of 158.3 and 138.7 in the
previous two games and a regular season figure of 99.0.
Manning’s WPA after this game was -0.42
after a regular season average of 0.20. If you’re looking to make a case
against Manning’s post-season record this is probably the logical place to
start. Although Russell Wilson has just proved otherwise, throwing four
interceptions in a championship game is usually a way to guarantee a loss.
The game wasn’t lost in the fourth quarter
with the Colts already down by 14 and the Patriots looking at a 98.6% chance of
winning but Manning did throw an interception as the Colts went for it on
fourth down at the Patriots 30 yard line. They managed to get the ball back and
Manning got his first touchdown of the day with 2:30 left in the quarter but a
four and out followed by another failed opportunity later in the quarter sealed
the victory for New England. The win percentages were small but Manning did
have the ball in his hands a lot during the fourth quarter.
Summary:
This was a game ruled by great defense from both
teams. Brady didn’t play particularly well, finishing with a passer rating of
76.1, but it was Manning who threw the crippling interceptions and failed to
convert on a couple of crucial fourth downs in the closing minutes. It was
Manning’s worst post season loss and even though he had been great up until
this game, people looked at last year’s loss against the Jets coupled with this
failure in New England and the Manning post season choker narrative was
starting to gather momentum.
AFC Divisional Round, Sunday January 16th, 2005
Spread: Patriots -1.0
Result: Patriots 20, Colts 3
Manning was coming off his MVP campaign and
a wild card win against Denver. The Patriots were just one point favorite’s but
they ended up winning the game with relative ease. This loss signalled the
beginning of the Foxboro curse storylines for Manning as he dropped to 0-7 in
New England.
Manning finished the game with a passer
rating of 69.3 after a career high figure of 121.1 in the regular season. He
was the best quarterback in football coming into this game but he couldn’t live
up to those expectations on a snowy day in New England. His WPA after this game
was -0.06 after a league high 0.44 during the regular season.
The Patriots just dominated this game,
holding the ball for 37:43 compared to just 22:17 for the Colts. Manning went
for 27-42 for 238 yards with zero touchdowns and one interception. He wasn’t
terrible in this game but he also didn’t do much to help his team win as
indicated by the minus WPA mark. Similar to the previous year, Brady didn’t
light up the box score but he accounted for both of New England’s touchdowns. Although
the game was already over, Manning was intercepted on the last play of the game
and depending on your overall opinion of Manning, this is either a perfect way
to sum up his performance in the playoffs or a meaningless play at the end of
already decided game.
Summary:
Manning was average, Brady was slightly above
average and defense and the weather conditions were the ultimate winners in
this game. Another hit to Manning’s playoff record but he had at least recorded
consecutive post-season victories at this stage.
AFC Wild Card Round, Sunday January 15th, 2006
Spread: Colts -8.5
Result: Steelers 21, Colts 18
Despite coming in as favorites, the Colts
were dominated by the Steelers for the first 55 minutes of this game. Manning
went 22-38 for 290 yards with one touchdown and finished with a solid passer
rating of 90.9, slightly lower than his regular season average of 104.1.
Manning’s WPA was 0.19 in this game after a
regular season average of 0.24 and as signalled by his passer rating, Manning
had a good all round game. The problem here, as I alluded to back in the intro,
is the expectations of people. Manning was a two time MVP at this stage and
came into this game with his team as 8.5 point favorites. Get ready, all caps
are coming, PEYTON MANNING SHOULD HAVE WILLED HIS TEAM TO VICTORY.
The Colts began the fourth quarter trailing
by 21-3 and with a 1.8% of winning the game. Through a crazy few series’ of
plays, they had a shot at going to overtime but their kicker missed a 46-yard
field goal. One of these events was a crucial sack that Manning took on fourth
down but it didn’t end up deciding the outcome of the game.
Summary:
For a certain section of the sports media, a loss
is a simply defined negative mark on a player’s resume regardless of how it
transpired. In case you hadn’t guessed by the 2000+ words already, I do not
subscribe to this way of thinking. Manning had a decent game and his team had a
chance to bring the game to overtime but because of events outside of his
control he takes another loss in the playoffs. The lack of offence up until the
crazy fourth quarter cannot be discounted but overall this was a strange,
unpredictable game that could have gone either way at the end.
2007. He won the Super Bowl, Hooray, no analysis needed!
AFC Divisional Round, Sunday January 13th, 2008
Spread: Colts -11
Result: Chargers 28, Colts 24
Despite losing both Philip Rivers and
LaDainian Tomlinson to injury during the game, the Chargers managed to defeat
the heavily favored Colts in Indianapolis. Manning finished with gaudy box
score numbers of 33-48 for 402 yards with three touchdowns and two
interceptions. His passer rating after this game was 97.7 and his QBR was 77.4
with regular season numbers of 98.0 and 78.4 respectively. His WPA was 0.18 with
a corresponding average of 0.25 in the regular season.
This is probably the type of game that
splits the ‘eye test’ guys from the ‘stat’ guys. Manning’s box score numbers
are strong but he also threw a pair of crippling interceptions. His first one
came at the end of the first half with the Colts on the Chargers 35 yard line
and in a position to score with the second one half way through the third
quarter.
One of the most frustrating parts about
this whole Manning discussion is the focus on his negative plays without
factoring in all the positive ones. He made a lot of great plays in this game
to help his team attempt to win the game and was the main reason they had a
shot at winning.
Summary:
To my mind, if you want to criticize Manning here I
think you can build a case around his failing to respond after the Chargers
went up by four with 4:54 left in the game. They had the ball on the San Diego seven-yard
line at one stage and had a win probability as high as 71% but they failed to
score. Manning played pretty great overall but he just couldn’t find that final
winning play.
AFC Divisional Round, Sunday January 3rd, 2009
Spread: Colts -11
Result: Chargers 28, Colts 24
Another regular season MVP trophy, another
playoff loss to the Chargers. Darren Sproles torched the Colts for 328 all-purpose
yards and Manning added another ‘one and done’ to his post-season record. He
finished the game with a passer rating of 90.4 after posting a regular season
average of 95.0. His QBR for the Chargers game was 75.4, just a touch under his
regular season average of 79.3.
Manning threw for 310 yards and a touchdown
with no interceptions. It’s fair to say he had a better game than his opposite
number, Philip Rivers, who threw for 216 yards with one interception. Manning
didn’t even touch the ball in overtime as Sproles and Rivers led a Chargers
drive from the Colts 30 yard line for a touchdown. His WPA was 0.20 after a
regular season average of 0.31.
Summary:
Manning did have the ball in the fourth quarter
while the Colts were up by three and with a win percentage as high as 88.3%.
They failed to convert that promising drive into points but this was more to do
with a costly holding penalty and a faltering run game than anything Manning
did. He was not at fault for this loss but a three time MVP losing in the first
round of the playoffs for the sixth time fills a lot more column inches than an
untimely holding penalty for an offensive lineman.
Super
Bowl XLIV, Sunday February 7th, 2010
Spread: Colts -4.5
Result: Saints 31, Colts 17
The ESPN recap of Super Bowl 44 put this Saints
victory down to the intangible and debatable quality of ‘heart’. For someone to
use something so unquantifiable as ‘heart’ as a way to describe victory when we
have any number of statistics at our fingertips is part of the reason why this
whole narrative around Manning even exists. I don’t have a metric or scale, or
anything in fact, to measure ‘heart’ so let’s take a look at the game
statistics instead.
Manning went 31-45 for 333 yards with a
touchdown and an interception for a passer rating of 88.5 and a QBR of 64.0.
His regular season numbers were 99.9 and 82.8 respectively (It is worth noting
that when taking his three playoff games together, his post season passer
rating and QBR figures are almost identical to his regular season numbers).
His WPA was 0.29 which is high but again, a
drop from his regular season average of 0.38. The game will be remembered for the Saints surprise onside
kick to start the second half but for Manning, his fourth quarter interception
is how most people frame his contribution to the game. It killed off any
opportunity the Colts had to launch an already unlikely comeback (the Saints
win % when Manning threw the pick was at 89.6%).
Summary:
Brees outplayed Manning in the biggest game of the
year and Manning threw the game-ending pick. In hindsight, this game probably
sounded the death knell for Manning and his post-season reputation. Sure, he
could have changed it for the better with more wins in his later years but
coming off the back of yet another MVP title and going into the game with his
team 4.5 point favorites, Manning just had to win to keep the naysayers quiet.
Throwing an interception in the fourth quarter made sure they were even louder.
AFC Wild
Card Round, Saturday January 8th, 2011
Spread: Colts -2
Result: Jets 17, Colts 16
Manning went 18-26 for 225 yards with a
touchdown and no interceptions. His passer rating of 108.7 was actually higher
than his regular season average of 91.9 as was his QBR. This would seem to
indicate that Manning had a slightly above average game and gave the Colts a
decent shot at victory. His WPA of 0.24 confirms this as it was also higher
than his regular season average of 0.19.
For the Manning bashers this loss is made
even more egregious as it came against a certain Mark Sanchez. Sanchez didn’t
exactly light up the stat sheet however as he went 18-31 for 189 yards with no
touchdowns and a pick. It was mainly the Jets defense that defeated Peyton but
who cares right? ‘PEYTON MANNING LOST TO MARK SANCHEZ, MARK FREAKING SANCHEZ,
IN THE PLAYOFFS!!!!”
Manning managed two fourth quarter drives
to keep the Colts in the game and put them ahead only to see Antonio Cromartie
return a kick off for 47 yards to set up the game winning field goal.
Summary: By the time Vinatieri made the 50-yard field goal for the Colts,
they had a 87.5 win % percentage. Some people criticized the Colts and Manning
for their time management and obviously just Manning himself for his failure to
complete a game sealing pass on 3rd and 6 with 1:02 remaining but in
reality, no one person lost this game. If you really want to assign blame and
give credit for one specific play then it would have to be Antonio Cromartie
for his 47 yard kickoff return and the Colts special teams for their failure
to make a tackle, but like most games, this game was decided by a number of
small plays at certain moments throughout the game.
AFC Divisional Round, Saturday January 12th, 2013
Spread: Broncos -9
Result: Ravens 38, Broncos 35
The ‘Peyton Manning collapses in the big
moments’ narrative is rivaled only by its younger brother, the ‘Peyton Manning
can’t perform in cold weather’ narrative, for entrance into the Manning hot
take hall of fame. The cold weather question, or it being presented as an
inarguable truth, can easily be debunked by taking a look at Manning’s splits separated by weather temperatures. There is no pattern of him delivering sup
par performances when the weather is colder, but that still doesn’t stop people
watching one play and drawing a simplistic, all-inclusive opinion.
That one play is of course Manning’s
interception at the end of the first quarter of overtime. His pass was picked
off by Corey Graham and immediately dropped the Broncos win percentage from
74.1% to 9%. It was a crippling mistake no doubt but it also doesn’t negate the
positive contributions Manning made to the Broncos chances of advancing to the
AFC title game. Manning went 28-43 for 290 yards with three touchdowns and two
interceptions. He had a passer rating of 88.3 and a total QBR of 56.4. These
were noticeably down from his season long averages of 105.8 and 82.4
respectively but his WPA of 0.29 was actually higher than his regular season
average of 0.24.
The WPA stat is crucial here as it provides
a figure for what most rational people who watched the game already knew,
Manning did not have a perfect game but he most certainly helped his team far
more than he hindered them. The Broncos had a 100% win percentage when Britton
Colquitt punted the ball back to the Ravens with 1:15 left in the fourth.
Earlier in the fourth, Manning led a drive from the Broncos 12-yard line that
ended with him throwing a 17-yard touchdown pass to Demaryius Thomas. This
drive was forgotten by the people who routinely criticize Manning’s playoff
performances about as quickly as it took the Broncos defense to give up the
game-tying touchdown; somewhere in the region of 20-30 seconds.
Summary:
There is no doubt that Manning’s interception in
overtime was pretty crucial in deciding who won this game. It was poor
execution on top of already poor decision-making. The point is, and the point
of all of this is, that despite what some people would have you believe, the
outcomes of games are not decided by one bad decision. Manning made a mistake
in a crucial moment but he also made many good decisions throughout the game
that put the Broncos in a good position to win.
Super Bowl XLVIII, Sunday February 2nd, 2014
Spread: Broncos -9
Result: Ravens 38, Broncos 35
If the loss against the Ravens was defined
by a team and a quarterback having a pretty decent day but ultimately making
one or two crucial mistakes, then this game came down to a team and a
quarterback playing terribly from the first minute to the last.
For his part, Manning went 34-49 for 280
yards with one touchdown and two interceptions for a rating of 73.5 and a QBR
of 24.4. These are obviously considerably lower than his season averages where
he posted figures of 115.1 and 82.9 respectively. His WPA was -0.19 after a
regular season average of 0.36, further emphasizing his drop off in
performance.
Summary:
There are no excuses for Manning in this game as he
played poorly and the Broncos lost. It’s important to point out however, that
the game wasn’t won or lost by Peyton Manning’s inability to perform in the big
moments. This was a team in the Seahawks that thoroughly out played and out
muscled the Broncos from start to finish. Manning was terrible, but not because
he faltered under the bright lights, it was because the Seahawks were just too
good for him.
AFC Divisional Round, Sunday January 11th, 2015
Spread: Broncos -7
Result: Colts 24, Broncos 13
Although the Broncos were seven point
favorites going into this game, there had been enough subpar performances from
Manning in the final weeks of the regular season that his poor showing here
wasn’t too much of a surprise. He went 26-46 for 211 yards with one touchdown
and zero interceptions. His QBR of 27.9 and his passer rating of 75.5 were
substantially lower than his regular season averages of 77.2 and 101.5
respectively.
Manning started the game strongly,
connecting with Demaryius Thomas on a one yard touchdown pass but that was to
prove to be a rare highlight for a Broncos offense that faltered on numerous
occasions throughout the day. Manning’s WPA after the game was -0.31 after a
regular season average of 0.25.
Summary:
Just like the previous year’s loss against the
Seahawks, the analysis needed here is minimal. This ranks as one of Manning’s
most insipid playoff performances and outside of the opening drive mentioned
above, he repeatedly failed to get the Broncos offense moving. There were even
some failures in the fourth quarter for all the Manning critics to salivate
over.
So there they are. Manning’s 13 post-season
losses in all their glory. One obvious factor that gets lost in the
discussion about his record is just the sheer amount of games and how we view
them. To put yourself in the position to lose 13 playoff games is something to
be applauded and factored in when discussing what those losses actually
represent. And yet for some reason this fact gets forgotten about and people
focus squarely on the outcome as opposed to the process.
When we describe players as 'clutch' or not, all we are doing is engaging in some two bit cod psychology. We have no idea how Peyton Manning feels as he gets ready to snap the ball with under two minutes left in a particularly tight game. What we can say, and with some certainty, is that there is no pattern of him repeatedly failing in the important moments of big games.